District Judge Blocks HHS Rule That Does Not Include Gender Ideology as ‘Sex’

Aug 20, 2020

HHS Transgender Protections

A U.S. district judge in New York blocked a rule by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Monday that rolled back an Obama-era rule that expanded the definition of “sex” to include gender identity, which is beyond the scope of clear language found in the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In his decision, U.S. District Judge Frederic Block said that the rule was not consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in June, Bostock v Clayton County, in which the Court redefine “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include homosexual behavior and transgender ideology.
 
The new rules from the HHS, set to take effect on Tuesday, are based on the principle that sex is determined by biology and would have provided protection to doctors who do not believe “gender affirming” surgery is appropriate medical care. 

However, Judge Block ruled that the administration should consider the impact of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bostock. He said the court was tasked with having to decide if the HHS rules were contrary to that decision. "The Court concludes that the proposed rules are, indeed, contrary to Bostock and, in addition, that HHS did act arbitrarily and capriciously in enacting them," Block said.  

The regulation has been put on hold while the court case proceeds.


News Sources:

Judge Blocks Trump Officials’ Attempt to End Transgender Health Protections

Judge blocks HHS rule protecting doctors who object to transgender surgery

Trump rule on transgender health blocked at the 11th hour

Decision
If you enjoyed this news story, help us continue providing these stories by giving your financial gift.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Subscribe

Donate to FACT

Make a Donation
Subscribe